Abstract
This study explores how learner responsibility ideology is constructed in selected texts from Pearson Inspire English International Textbook, with the aim of examining how learners are positioned as self-regulating individuals responsible for managing health, digital practices, physical safety, and fake news identification. Using Norman Fairclough's three-dimensional model, the study examines the linguistic and discursive strategies through which learner responsibility ideology is constructed. Adopting a qualitative Critical Discourse Analysis approach, the data consists of four purposively selected instructional passages addressing hydration awareness, online safety, cycling safety, and fake news identification. The findings indicate that the textbook constructs learner responsibility as a multidimensional ideological framework using imperative structure, direct address, evaluative expressions, and instructional sequences. These discursive strategies present responsibility as an individual obligation and promote learner identity and self-regulation as a key characteristic of learners. The study further demonstrates that the textbook constructs a specific learner identity characterized by responsibility, caution, and informed decision-making. It shows that beyond its pedagogical function; the textbook also functions as an ideological resource that shapes learner identity and promotes expectations of self-regulation. While previous research has examined ideology in ELT textbooks through various perspectives, limited attention has been given to how learner responsibility ideology is constructed and how it shapes learner identity and self-regulation.
References
Afzal, T., Chishti, M.I., Jadoon, A.U.R. and Mushtaq, H. (2021) ‘A comparative analysis of ideological constructions embedded in English textbooks: A critical discourse perspective’, Humanities &
Social Sciences Reviews, 9(2), pp. 487–498. doi:10.18510/hssr.2021.9247.
Babaii, E. and Sheikhi, M. (2018) ‘Traces of neoliberalism in English teaching materials: A critical discourse analysis’, Critical Discourse Studies, 15(3), pp. 247–264. doi:10.1080/17405904.2017.1398671.
Benson, P. (2011) Teaching and Researching Autonomy in Language Learning. 2nd edn. Harlow: Pearson Education.
Block, D. (2007) Second Language Identities. London: Continuum.
Bori, P. (2020) ‘Neoliberal governmentality in global English textbooks’, Classroom Discourse, 11(2), pp. 149–163. doi:10.1080/19463014.2020.1755327.
Fairclough, N. (1992) Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Fairclough, N. (1995) Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. London: Longman.
Fairclough, N. (2001) Language and Power. 2nd edn. Harlow: Pearson Education.
Fairclough, N. (2003) Analysing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research. London: Routledge.
Gharbavi, A. and Mousavi, S.A. (2012) ‘A content analysis of textbooks: Investigating gender bias as a social prominence in Iranian high school English textbooks’, English Linguistics Research, 1(1), pp. 42–49. doi:10.5430/elr.v1n1p42.
Halse, C., Hartung, C. & Wright, J. (2017). Responsibility and responsibilisation in education. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 38(1), 1–4.
Hmouma, M. A. (2024). Unveiling Rhetorical Complexity: A Faircloughian Approach to Deconstructing
Martin Luther King Jr.'s' I Have a Dream'Discourse. Aljameai, (39), 39–53.
Hmouma, Mohamed (2025). Analyzing Trump’s 2025 inaugural address using Fairclough’s Critical discourse analysis model. International Journal of Research Publication and Reviews, 6(1), 4630-4636.
Holborow, M. (2007) ‘Language, ideology and neoliberalism’, Journal of Language and Politics, 6(1), pp. 51–73.
Holec, H. (1981) Autonomy and Foreign Language Learning. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Norton, B. (2000) Identity and Language Learning: Gender, Ethnicity and Educational Change. Harlow: Pearson Education.
Van Dijk, T.A. (1998) Ideology: A Multidisciplinary Approach. London: Sage Publications.
Zimmerman, B.J. (2000) ‘Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective’, in Boekaerts, M., Pintrich, P.R. and Zeidner, M. (eds.) Handbook of Self-Regulation. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, pp. 13–39.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
