A Critical Discourse Analysis of Equality and Resistance in Seretse Khama’s Kgotla Speech in the Movie A United Kingdom (2016) Using Van Dijk’s Socio-Cognitive Framework
Jraba Street, Tripoli 0021, Libya
PDF

Keywords

Critical Discourse Analysis
political rhetoric
Seretse Khama
Equality
Resistance

Categories

How to Cite

Klella, A. S. A. (2026). A Critical Discourse Analysis of Equality and Resistance in Seretse Khama’s Kgotla Speech in the Movie A United Kingdom (2016) Using Van Dijk’s Socio-Cognitive Framework. International Journal of Peer-Reviewed Multidisciplinary Research, 2(1), 26-39. https://ijprmr.com/index.php/ijprmr/article/view/12

Abstract

Political speeches are powerful tools for shaping social ideologies, constructing leadership identities, and challenging oppressive systems. This study employs Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA), guided by van Dijk’s socio-cognitive framework, to examine Seretse Khama’s Kgotla speech as portrayed in the film A United Kingdom (2016). The analysis explores how the speech constructs discourses of equality, resistance, and moral leadership across textual, cognitive, and social dimensions. At the textual level, Khama’s strategic use of metaphors, parallelism, rhetorical questions, repetition, and emotional appeals frames segregation as morally and socially unacceptable while emphasizing equality as a universal ethical principle. At the cognitive level, these linguistic strategies shape audience mental representations, foster empathy, and encourage critical reflection on the ethical implications of racial discrimination. At the social level, the speech situates its arguments within the historical and political realities of colonial Bechuanaland, challenging entrenched power structures and legitimizing Khama’s leadership based on moral and ethical principles. The findings demonstrate that the speech operates simultaneously across multiple levels, using rhetoric to mobilize social consciousness, construct ideological meaning, and promote collective ethical responsibility. This study highlights the enduring importance of language in political discourse and the value of CDA as a framework for analyzing how leaders communicate resistance, equality, and moral authority.

PDF

References

Beard, A. (2000). The language of politics. Routledge.

Charteris-Black, J. (2011). Politicians and rhetoric: The persuasive power of metaphor (2nd ed.). Palgrave Macmillan.

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Sage Publications.

Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power (3rd ed.). Routledge.

Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. Longman.

Rosenstone, R. A. (2012). History on film/history in words: Reflections on the possibility of really putting history onto film (2nd ed.). Routledge.

Van Dijk, T. A. (1993). Principles of critical discourse analysis. Discourse & Society, 4(2), 249–283. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926593004002006

Van Dijk, T. A. (1998). Ideology: A multidisciplinary approach. Sage Publications.

Van Dijk, T. A. (2006). Discourse and manipulation. Discourse & Society, 17(3), 359–383. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926506060250

Wodak, R., & Meyer, M. (2016). Methods of critical discourse studies (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2026 Akram Shebani Ahmad Klella (Author)

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.