Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Face-Saving Strategies in the Libyan EFL Preparatory Classroom: A Discourse Analysis of Teacher-Student Interaction

Abstract

This study investigated teachers' use of face-saving strategies and their influence on classroom interaction in an English as a Foreign Language EFL classroom. Using a qualitative research design, data were collected through classroom observations and semi-structured interviews with four students. The data were analyzed using Braun and Clarke's (2006) thematic analysis. The findings revealed that teachers frequently employed face-saving strategies such as praise, encouragement, respectful communication, and indirect error correction. These strategies enhanced students' confidence, reduced embarrassment, encouraged active participation, and promoted positive classroom interaction. The classroom observation findings supported the interview data, demonstrating that face-saving strategies contribute to creating a supportive and interactive learning environment. The study concludes that integrating face-saving strategies into EFL teaching can foster effective classroom communication, support students' emotional well-being, and encourage greater participation in the language learning process.

Keywords

Face-saving strategies, politeness theory, classroom interaction, EFL classrooms, teacher–student interaction, qualitative research

PDF

References

  1. Fitriyani, S., & Andriyanti, E. (2020). Teacher and Students’ Politeness Strategies in EFL Classroom Interactions. IJELTAL (Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics). https://doi.org/10.21093/ijeltal.v4i2.473.
  2. Humaero, S. (2019). Respecting and Saving Face in EFL Classroom Discourse. Proceedings of the Second Conference on Language, Literature, Education, and Culture (ICOLLITE 2018). https://doi.org/10.2991/icollite-18.2019.29.
  3. Latrech, A., & Alazzawie, A. (2022). The use of politeness strategies in teacher–student interaction in the Omani EFL classroom. Saudi Journal of Language Studies. https://dsoi.org/10.1108/sjls-06-2022-0052.
  4. Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge University Press.
  5. Walsh, S. (2011). Exploring classroom discourse: Language in action. Routledge.
  6. Virginia Braun, V., & Victoria Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
  7. Sembiring, E. M. B., Simanjuntak, F. M. P.,Tarigan, K. J., &Silalahi, V. (2023). Politeness in the EFL Classroom Interaction: Strategies in Avoiding Face Threatening Act (FTA). Journal of Classroom Action Research,2(1), 18-26.
  8. Aporbo, R. J., Barabag, J. M. C., Catig, B. U., & Claveria, C. M. P. (2024). Face-threatening and Face-saving Speech Acts of Teachers: A Discourse Analysis of Classroom interactions. World Journal of English Language, 14(3),413.
  9. Padilla Cruz, M. (2004). Phatic utterances as face-threatening/saving acts or politeness strategies: A pragmatic reflection for their teaching in the L2 class. EPOS: Revista de Filologia, (20), 799-804.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.